Sabtu, 30 Juni 2012

2 New Ways to Pay Off Student Loans

2 New Ways to Pay Off Student Loans

SmarterBank allows you to chip away at student loan debt while you shop.

A new banking program allows you to chip away at student loan debt while you shop.

Paying off student loans is a challenge that more than 37 million Americans face. But at least two websites have launched novel ways to make the process a little less painful--and maybe even fun. 

[Consider the positives of a student loan burden.] 

1. SmarterBucks: A new debit card rewards program created by student loan information site SimpleTuition allows card holders to pay down a bit of their student loan debts with each card swipe. 

Users need to register for an online bank account through SmarterBank, which is tied to the rewards program. For every signature debit card purchase (meaning you don't enter your PIN), a small percentage based on the money spent is put toward the principal on the user's student loan of choice. 

For the first $100 spent on a purchase, users automatically get 0.5 percent of the total paid; anything more will earn an additional 1 percent towards the principal of the loan. (A $500 purchase, then, would amount to $4.50: $0.50 for the first $100 and $4 for the second $400.) 

It's not a swift ticket to becoming debt free, but the percentage rewards can gradually chip away at the principal of your outstanding burden, notes Doug Lowenstein, executive vice president of banking and rewards at SimpleTuition. 

"It's a great, low maintenance way to make headway against your student loans through things that you would be doing otherwise," he says.

Loan holders can also open their accounts to benefactors, allowing relatives and friends to put lump sums down toward the debt. 

2. SaveUp.com: Need additional incentives to make you repay your loans? Consider SaveUp.com, a free website that rewards users for paying down debt. 

The site likens financial tasks to other social games on the Internet, says site cofounder Priya Haji, and is open to any U.S. resident with an E-mail address, a financial account, and any type of loan burden. Every dollar you put toward your loan burden earns a credit, which can then be used to play virtual games for prizes, ranging from gift cards from a variety of sponsors to a cool $2 million. 

"There may be that one payment you make on your student loan that makes your whole loan go away," Haji says. 

Though the chances of winning big may be slim, users of the site will likely become more informed, at least. The site incorporates financial literacy lessons and videos to help loan holders learn more and earn additional credits. 

"It's just a fun, extra reward for doing the right thing," Haji says. 

Trying to fund your education? Get tips and more in the U.S. News Paying for College center.

Map Out Your MBA Timeline

Map Out Your MBA Timeline

stressed, studying, computer, stress, student

To avoid last-minute cramming, MBA aspirants should start working on their applications early.

Once you've decided to pursue an MBA, you've got your work cut out for you. MBA applicants need to fit studying for the GMAT and developing essays in with other personal and professional commitments. If you're planning to apply to business school in the fall, now is the time to come up with a game plan for completing the admissions components within a schedule that doesn't necessitate sleepless nights and a jumbo bottle of Maalox. The best way to do this is to put together your MBA application timeline months before your target deadlines.

Allot time for essays and the GMAT: We're slightly more than three months away from Round One at most schools. If you haven't started your applications and are wondering if you still have time, it depends. Among the factors you should weigh: how much time you have in your schedule, how difficult it is for you to write essays, and how focused and motivated you are. In general, three to four months is enough time to submit several applications in the first round. You'll be working hard, but that is a realistic timeline.

[Read about how more b-schools accept the GRE.]

The amount of time MBA aspirants will spend on their applications will vary, depending on writing abilities and general work efficiency. That said, plan to spend between 40 and 60 hours preparing four to eight applications. Non-native English speakers will also likely need to allot more time on their applications, particularly on writing, revising, editing, proofing, formatting, and inputting essays. 

The other piece of this puzzle is, of course, the GMAT. Have you completed the GMAT and are you satisfied with your score? If you still need to take the GMAT, you may have a lot of work ahead of you, as applicants typically devote at least 100 hours to test preparation. Depending on where you are in the process, you may have to take a prep class and perhaps take the test more than once. If this is the case, Round One may not be a realistic option.

[Read 5 tips from MBA applicants who've taken the revised GMAT.]

Structure your work sessions: Some people work most efficiently when they can break up tasks into smaller, more manageable pieces, while others prefer to devote several hours to their writing in one sitting. MBA applicants should be aware of the way they work most effectively and structure their writing and editing sessions accordingly.

I've had candidates call me a week before applications are due, planning to take the week off of work, deprive themselves of sleep, and devote all of their time to writing essays to submit in the first round. They figure that 100 hours of work should do the trick. While that may be plenty of time, I'm a big believer that the time should be spread out. Because this is such a personal, soul-searching process, sometimes you just need to call it a night and sleep on itâ€"tough to do when you only have a week.

I typically recommend that candidates allocate two to three hours each time they sit down to work on their essays, particularly for the first few drafts. Essays should be approached holistically; you won't have a compelling final product if you snatched 15 minutes here and 30 minutes there to cobble together that "knowledge into action" essay for the Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania.

Conversely, most applicants should also avoid the "marathon session." Few people are still sharp or creative eight hours into a writing and editing session. If you need to make up for lost time, try breaking it up with a session in the morning and another in the evening.

[Read about how prospective MBAs may face tougher applications.]

Allow some distance: Applicants should also build several weeks for reflection and feedback into their MBA timeline. If you can come back to your essays days later with fresh eyes, you'll often think of a better example or more inspired language to illustrate a certain point. This won't happen if you're forced to work at warp speed.

Distributing your writing and editing over a reasonable period also makes it easier for friends, family, or colleagues to provide feedback. It's unfair to ask someone to turn around comments in a 24-hour period, so provide them with a few days to give you their critiques. Leave yourself adequate time to reflect upon and incorporate their feedback.

We're just getting into the thick of things for most schools. If you're planning to apply this year, now is the time to get started: on GMAT prep, writing essays, selecting recommenders, or just generally piecing together your strategy. The b-school application process is stressful, but careful planning will make the experience manageable and help you channel your energies into continually improving your candidacy until the moment you submit your applications.

6 Reasons Why Graduate School Pays Off

6 Reasons Why Graduate School Pays Off

graduate school, salary, money

Graduate school can positively impact career growth and salary potential.

Despite the professional success of many who did not earn a college diploma, it is becoming clear that earning an education matters. In addition, an undergraduate degree is increasingly not enough to land the solid, well-paying jobs of the future. What's needed, experts say, is a graduate degree. 

However, with a national jobs forecast that remains weak and the cost of higher education continuing to grow faster than the rate of inflation, why would someone want to consider the academic, personal, and financial rigors of graduate school? Here are a few reasons why grad schoolâ€"today and in the futureâ€"makes a difference in your career and your earning potential: 

1. Personal growth: Some people are lifelong learners. They have an insatiable desire to add to their knowledge reservoir, challenge themselves academically, and experience what they consider to be among the most rewarding life pursuits: developing the mind. For these individuals, a graduate education offers the opportunity to do all of that and in a structured way that can deliver great personal satisfaction. 

2. Greater employment opportunities: In many career sectors, such as higher ed administration, public affairs, and social services, a master's degree is replacing a bachelor's as the minimum requirement for employment. With a bachelor's degree in the 1980s, one could secure an entry level position as an admissions counselor, academic adviser, or student services coordinator. By the 2000s, applicants for these same entry-level positions were not even considered unless they held a master's degree. While holding a graduate degree is not a guarantee of ultimate success, it certainly opens many more doors for employment. 

[See the Best Jobs of 2012.] 

3. Greater career advancement: Earning a graduate degree is evidence of persistence, determination, intellectual prowess, and the ability to handle challenging environmentsâ€"all of which are sought-after qualities for individuals filling manager and director positions. An employee who has demonstrated success in a long-term situation that requires stamina, discipline, leadership, and the ability to work well with others is going to be in line for growth opportunities within his or her organization. 

4. Financial reward: Anyone considering graduate school would be less than wise if he or she did not consider the return on investment. For grad degree holders, the numbers are favorable: U.S. workers between the ages of 21 and 64 with a master's degree or higher earn an average annual salary of $55,242, versus those with a bachelor's degree whose average annual salary is $42,877, according to the United States Census Bureau. That represents nearly a 30 percent difference in average annual salaryâ€"and offers clear evidence that completing a graduate degree can make a positive impact on one's financial situation. 

[Learn which MBAs have the most value at graduation.] 

5. Sense of accomplishment: As a graduate and business school dean who witnessed his students graduateâ€"and as a grad student who experienced it firsthand years earlierâ€"the feeling of personal satisfaction one gets from walking across the platform to receive a master's or doctoral degree is overwhelming. The effort put forth to complete your studies, despite moments of doubt and uncertainty, will stand as a central character-building life experience. 

6. Greater recognition and credibility: There are countless numbers of graduate degree holders who have gone on to accomplish great things, and who are afforded the respect and recognition they deserve and have earned. Unquestionably, an advanced degree makes a difference on a résumé. It says something about who you are and the dedication you have to your chosen field. 

Dr. Don Martin, Ph.D., is a higher education admissions expert, author, and former admissions dean at Columbia University, Northwestern University, Wheaton College, and University of Chicago Booth School of Business. To learn more about graduate admissions, visit gradschoolroadmap.com.

Jumat, 29 Juni 2012

Justice Won't Prosecute Holder for Contempt

Justice Won't Prosecute Holder for Contempt

Attorney General Eric Holder

Attorney General Eric Holder addresses the media in New Orleans, La.

By LARRY MARGASAK and PETE YOST, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) â€" The Justice Department has declared that Attorney General Eric Holder's decision to withhold information about a bungled gun-tracking operation from Congress does not constitute a crime and he won't be prosecuted for contempt of Congress.

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, the department says that it will not bring the congressional contempt citation against Holder to a federal grand jury and that it will take no other action to prosecute the attorney general.

[READ: Eric Holder Skips Off to Disney World.]

Deputy Attorney General James Cole says the decision is in line with long-standing Justice Department practice across administrations of both political parties.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Will Healthcare Ruling Cause Some Republicans To Switch Sides?

Will Healthcare Ruling Cause Some Republicans To Switch Sides?

People march in support of the Obama administration's health care act.

People march in support of the Obama administration's health care act.

A post that appeared on social news site Reddit just hours after the Supreme Court healthcare ruling caught Whispers' eye Friday:

"I am Republican, prepared to vote for Obama. I... never voted for a Democratic president."

The Redditor went on to explain that after years of consistent insurance coverage, insurance company Blue Cross/Blue Shield suddenly refused to cover some care for his wife because of a thyroid issue. "It is ridiculous! I support Obama in his efforts to change this about our healthcare system," he wrote.

Is this man the outlier, or an indicator of how the Supreme Court ruling could actually swing the vote for Obama?

Pollster Scott Rasmussen told Whispers he believes that kind of change is unlikely, not just because the law is deeply unpopular, but also because most Americans have not yet been impacted by it.

But Linda Killian, who wrote the book "Swing Vote: The Untapped Power of Independents," told Whispers there could be a small impact among the swing vote.

"For those who have had a bad experience with healthcare, this [ruling] will mean a lot for them," she said.

Among the hundreds of reactions to the Reddit post was a comment by an independent voter who became a registered Democrat, and another registered Republican who said he would vote for Obamaâ€"both over the issue of healthcare.

A Gallup poll released Friday afternoon showed that, at least for now, a slight majority of independents support the Supreme Court's decision. While some 45 percent agree with the ruling, 42 percent disagree.

"After weighing options," tweeted a California entrepreneur and apparent swing voter Thursday, "this independent voter is siding with the President Obama on healthcare... Tomorrow will hurt Republicans."

Elizabeth Flock is a staff writer for U.S. News World Report. You can contact her at eflock@usnews.com or follow her on Twitter and Facebook.

Afghanistan Election Could Mean 'All Bets Are Off'

Afghanistan Election Could Mean 'All Bets Are Off'

Afghan Local Police wait in formation for their graduation ceremony in Kajran district, Daykundi province, Afghanistan.

Afghan Local Police wait in formation for their graduation ceremony in Kajran district, Daykundi province, Afghanistan.

"All bets are off" in Afghanistan later this decade if a regime more corrupt than that of sitting chief executive Hamid Karzai is elected, says one U.S. military expert.

Elections slated for 2014 in Afghanistan will coincide with the final withdrawal of U.S. and NATO troops from the war- and corruption-torn nation. Afghans are expected to elect a new president then, as Karzai reportedly has backed off plans to seek another term.

Michael O'Hanlon, a military analyst at the Brookings Institution, told a House panel Friday that a senior Afghan official recently confided that his top security concern is the coming presidential election.

[Photo Gallery: Summer Heat Arrives in Full Force.]

"It we elect the wrong person," O'Hanlon said the Afghan official told him, "all bets are off."

U.S. officials from the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations for years publicly and privately pressed Karzai to tamp down on government corruption.

But O'Hanlon and other experts warn it could get much worse under a new leader.

A recent Congressional Research Service report sounds a similar refrain.

"There is concern among many observers that U.S. efforts to help build Afghan governance, democracy, civil society, and rule of law will founder as the United States and its partners seek to wind down their involvement," states the report. "Some argue that the informal power structure, which has always been at least as significant a factor in governance as the formal power structure, will sustain governance beyond 2014. Others say greater reliance on the informal power structure will invite even more corruption and arbitrary administration of justice than is the case now."

O'Hanlon told the committee one way to ensure a new Pasthun regime at least matches the performance of the Karzai administration is to appoint a vice president and senior Cabinet ministers who hails from the Tajik sect.

Pashtuns are the largest ethic group in Afghanistan, making up 42 percent of its total population, according to the CIA and Library of Congress. Tajiks make up 27 percent, making them the second-largest ethnic group there.

The slate of Afghan presidential candidates remains foggy. But O'Hanlon is sounding a warning, saying if several of the individuals rumored to be mulling a run get into the race, U.S. officials "need to find a way to veto [them]."

The catch there? As the U.S. military has a smaller footprint and combat power in Afghanistan, Washington's influence will steadily decline, experts say.

John T. Bennett covers national security and foreign policy for U.S. News World Report. You can contact him at jbennett@usnews.com or follow him on Twitter.

Weather's Weird Role in the Slowing Economy

Weather's Weird Role in the Slowing Economy

Bright sun and a mild breeze usually make everybody feel better. But temperate weather may be casting clouds over the economy.

[PICTURES: The Thrill of Victory, the Agony of Defeatâ€"Wimbledon 2012]

Data from the last few months reveal a worrisome stall in growth, for reasons that aren't completely clear. Recent employment reports show a discouraging slowdown in hiring. Business spending has been weaker than expected. Consumers, absorbing all the bad news, have been losing confidence and spending less, too.

Clement weather, ironically, might be partly to blame. One of the warmest winters on record generated buoyant economic activity during the first few months of the year, including robust spending and a healthy pace of hiring. It only seemed logical that some of that spending would have been pulled forward from later in the year, since mild weather doesn't create more money, it just gives consumers a reason to spend it sooner. And on cue, economic reports for April and May showed some givebacks.

The question now is whether the economy will rebound from the spring downturn, or remain stuck in a rut. A summer snapback would suggest weather trends did in fact create an exaggerated boom-bust cycle earlier in the year, with the economy returning to a more normal (and comforting) growth level.

[RELATED: See why the fight over Obamacare will continue.]

But many economists think that should have happened already.

"The longer the slowdown persists, the less we can blame it on the weather," Bank of America Merrill Lynch recently advised clients. If weak growth continues, it will most likely mean there are deeper problems in the economy. It's not hard to guess what those might be.

The financial crisis in Europe is clearly constricting growth in many regions, and small steps to fix the problem so far haven't convinced investors the worst is over. In the United States, there's growing concern about how Congress will handle a momentous set of tax hikes and spending cuts set to go into effect at the end of the year. If Washington bungles the job and tumbles off the "fiscal cliff," another recession is likely.

The real question is how much those worries are depressing business and consumer spending in the present. The recent drop in oil and gasoline prices ought to provide a mini-stimulus that boosts consumer spending a little, but that hasn't shown up so far in the economic data. An incipient housing recoveryâ€"especially in multifamily constructionâ€"ought to be providing a boost as well, but that's not moving the needle either.

If the jobs report for June and other key indicators are underwhelming, it will probably be safe to say we can no longer blame a weak economy on the weather. And there are some important fingers in the air. The Federal Reserve is closely watching the forthcoming data, which could determine whether it kicks off another round of quantitative easing in the fall. And of course the direction of the economy over the next few months will help determine who wins the presidency in November. Guessing the outcome is about as easy as predicting ... well, you know.

Rick Newman is the author of Rebounders: How Winners Pivot From Setback To Success. Follow him on Twitter: @rickjnewman. 

STEM Heavy Hitters Close Out U.S. News Conference

STEM Heavy Hitters Close Out U.S. News Conference

DALLASâ€"Over the course of three days and more than 30 panels, experts talked about the science, technology, engineering, and math education crisis in the United Statesâ€"but the final panel was easily the most impassioned and lively of them all, with STEM education's heavy hitters finally getting their chance to weigh in.

"I think you'd agree we saved the best for last," U.S. News Editor Brian Kelly said. "STEM is a community we're trying to create. It's a community, and this is the board of directors."

The Hall of Fame panel reiterated much of what had been said over the past few days at the 2012 U.S. News STEM Solutions Summitâ€"that America needs to train more STEM teachers and pay them better, private-public partnerships between businesses and schools are the way forward, and universities have to find a way to keep engineering students from dropping out.

"Two thirds of the students that enter college as an engineering major switch majors, and we assume that's OK," said Freeman Hrabowski, president of the University of Marylandâ€"Baltimore County. "They say that the first year of science and engineering is made up of weed-out courses. I'd argue that it does not have to be that way."

Overall, the speakers' messages were ones of hopeâ€"Tom Luce, director of the National Math + Science Institute, said everyone knows there are pockets of STEM success all around the nation, but it's time to stop championing small pilot programs and to start scaling them up.

"We've got to focus on finding the few things that work and scale them up across the country. … Corporations like to fund [small programs that produce] 1,000 flowers that bloom. Well, that doesn't produce scale," Luce said. 

Richard Alley, a geosciences professor at Pennsylvania State Universityâ€"University Park and host of PBS's EARTH: The Operators Manual, agreed.

"Every pilot program works, because they get funding, because there's somebody behind it," he said, adding that to get students interested in STEM, America has to hold up successful engineers as idols. "How many of our students in third, sixth, or ninth grade know they want to be like [former Lockheed Martin CEO] Norm Augustine when they grow up? We've got to get the truth out thereâ€"that this is the way to success, that this works, that this is cool."

If you missed the live stream of the panel, check back Monday, when a full video will be availableâ€"it's a must-watch.

How to Prepare for a Fulfilling Retirement

How to Prepare for a Fulfilling Retirement

Sooner or later, each of us will come to a point in our life when we cross over to join the ever-growing group of retirement-age people. Many of us will wonder how it is possible that we have become 65 years old. Hopefully the shock will be momentary, and we will get on with living.

Of course, to experience a fulfilling retirement life we have to plan and prepare for this moment. Rolling into age 65 without having taken the necessary steps to prepare can result in confusion, stress, and boredom. Worst of all, those who don’t prepare risk missing out on opportunities to take on inspiring second careers or exciting new hobbies.

It is not easy to plan and prepare for retirement when today already seems to consume 110 percent of our time and effort. One can easily become overwhelmed with the myriad of investment options and convoluted requirements for Social Security and Medicare.

Amid all of this complexity, there is one rule of thumb to understand and follow. It readily applies to financial preparations for retirement but also extends beyond that: Live within your means. Or to put it another way, don’t spend your money before you earn it. This rule of thumb can help you to focus your finances before and during retirement. Here’s why living within your means is the key to a fulfilling life before and during retirement:

You avoid adding debt. Buying on credit has been the downfall of many hard working people. Granted, there may be emergency situations where you have no choice but to break out the credit card to tide you over. The problem is buying things on credit you do not need. Spending money you do not have for something you want, regardless of whether you can afford it, is a recipe for disaster. A better course of action is to save up until you can pay cash instead of charging it. Don’t spend your money before you earn it. And don’t try to keep up with your neighbors by chasing more bright and shiny things. Debt avoidance is especially important in retirement when your income is reduced.

Saving becomes easier. If you are living within your means, when you get to the end of the month you should have something left over. Since you are not spending this residual you can put a portion of it aside into savings. If you continue to set aside a little something on a regular basis it will grow. However, if you are living beyond your means, this potential savings will go toward credit card interest or other black holes.

You discover what makes you content. Living within your means gives you a better understanding of what is most important to you. Instead of buying impulsively, you carefully weigh the cost and start to make better decisions. You realize it is not necessary to always eat at five-star restaurants. Suddenly Levi jeans look just as good as $200 dollar pants. A new house is not so critical if it will lock you into a big long-term mortgage. You start to grasp the reality that material possessions do not equal personal freedom. If you cannot afford it, you discover that life will go on and you can still be content.

Dave Bernard is not yet retired but has begun his due diligence to plan for a fulfilling retirement. With a focus on the non-financial aspects of retiring, he shares his discoveries and insights on his blog Retirementâ€"Only the Beginning.

How the Health Reform Ruling Impacts Retirees

How the Health Reform Ruling Impacts Retirees

The Supreme Court’s ruling on the Affordable Care Act indicates that many of the Medicare changes impacting older Americans and retirees will remain intact. Here’s a look at how retiree out-of-pocket costs have changed due to health reform:

[See Retirement Spots With Year-Round Pleasant Weather.]

Closing the prescription drug gap. Medicare prescription drug plans have a coverage gap, often called the donut hole, that begins after an enrollee incurs $2,930 in drug costs and lasts until catastrophic coverage kicks in after a retiree has spent $6,658 out-of-pocket. However, the Affordable Care Act has already begun to close this coverage gap and will completely eliminate it by 2020. Brand-name drugs purchased in the gap are discounted by 50 percent and generic drugs by 14 percent in 2012. The discounts will increase to 21 percent on generics and 52.5 percent on brand-name drugs in 2013. And in 2010, beneficiaries who fell into the Part D coverage gap received a $250 rebate. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services says more than 5.1 million Medicare beneficiaries have collectively saved over $3.2 billion on prescription drugs due to the rebate checks and prescription drug discounts in 2010 and 2011.

Free preventative care. A free annual wellness visit that includes a health-risk assessment and personalized prevention plan was added to the services covered by Medicare by the Affordable Care Act. Cost-sharing requirements for many preventive services such as cancer screenings, mammograms, and colonoscopies were also eliminated for Medicare beneficiaries.

[See 10 Important Ages for Retirement Planning.]

Modest premium increases. The standard Medicare Part B premium is $99.90 per month in 2012, up $3.50 from 2011. And many people who first signed up for Medicare Part B in 2010 or 2011 actually saw their premiums decline in 2012. Medicare recipients whose modified adjusted gross income is greater than $85,000 for individuals or $170,000 for couples must pay higher Part B premiums, ranging from $40 to $219.80 per month more than the standard rate in 2012, but premiums also decreased for many high earning retirees.

Lower out-of-pocket costs. The amount of money retirees will need to pay for medical costs throughout retirement declined sharply when the health reform bill was passed, but has started to grow again since then. A 2010 Fidelity Investments study conducted before the health reform legislation was passed found that a 65-year-old couple retiring in 2010 would need $250,000 to pay for out-of-pocket health care costs throughout retirement, including deductibles, copays, and other likely out-of-pocket costs for Medicare Parts A, B, and D. When the analysis was preformed again in 2011, after the health reform bill was passed, the estimate fell by 8 percent to $230,000, before climbing 4 percent to $240,000 in 2012.

[See States with the Best Older Voter Turnout.]

The Employee Benefit Research Institute also found that out-of-pocket health costs for retirees have declined since the health reform legislation was passed. EBRI calculated that a 65-year-old couple with median drug expenses would have needed $210,000 to have a 50 percent chance of having enough money to cover health care expenses throughout retirement in 2009, but that estimate declined to $158,000 after health reform was passed in 2010.

Health Buzz: MRI Birth Video Sheds Light on Labor

Health Buzz: MRI Birth Video Sheds Light on Labor

MRI Video Captures Childbirth From the Inside

It's birth like you've never seen it before. For the first time, researchers have used magnetic resonance imaging to peer inside a woman's body during labor. The images were shot during a normal birth at a German hospital in November 2010, and while still MRI images were previously published, the video was not available until this week. It's made with time-lapsed images over the final 45 minutes of labor. The video is intended to help doctors learn more about how to deliver and manage labor, while preventing complications. "The main reasons for the research are to answer the question of why a birth may stall and to visually capture the birthing process and any complications," Christian Bamberg, who led the research team, told Reuters in 2010. "The images are spectacular. They show which movements the fetus makes in the birth c anal, how its bones move and how its head changes shape during birth."

Children's Cereal: Healthy Start or Junk Food?

Imagine you are 5 years old. In the supermarket cereal aisle. Towering above you are rows upon rows of cardboard boxes, brightly colored like construction paper, and emblazoned with your favorite mascots or silly characters that seem to hug you from their perch on the shelves. Sure, there are some understated choicesâ€"the simple yellow Cheerios box, offering up a bowl of mutely-colored rings. But remember, you're 5. You're more likely drawn to the rainbow of fun featured on the Fruity Pebbles package. Not only does this cereal come techicolored, but it's got Fred Flintstone on the box. You wish you could go barefoot and drive a car with your feet.... you tug at your mom and begin begging: "Please, please, please, can we get Fruity Pebbles?!!" 

Pebbles (the fruity and cocoa versions) was ranked the least nutritious cereal in a recent report by Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity that lambasted cereal companies for peddling their poorest choices to kids. 

Yale decided to check up on the food industry's plan to police itselfâ€"the Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative. Formed in 2006, the initiative called for promoting healthy foods and lifestyles to kids. Two years later, Yale studied the cereal market and reviewed the landscape last year. The first report found that companies were "doing zero marketing of their healthiest cereals," to kids, says Kelly Brownell, a Yale University professor of psychology who directs the Rudd Center. Today, "the number is still zero," and, furthermore, "they're doing aggressive marketing of their least healthy foods. [Read more: Children's Cereal: Healthy Start or Junk Food?] 

Try These At-Home Sunburn Treatments

It's all fun in the sunâ€"until someone gets burned. Looking and feeling like a lobster? Ouch. We've all been there: Half of American adults under 30 say they've had a sunburn at least once in the previous year, according to government data released in May. And just one blistering burn can double the risk of developing melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer. "It's not worth having such a bad sunburn after day one that you have to stay inside the rest of the weekend and watch everyone else having fun through the window," says dermatologist Jessica Krant, founder of the Art of Dermatology practice in New York.

Prevention, of course, is easier than treatment. The smartest advice: Avoid the sun between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m., the hottest hours of the day. Wear thin clothing that covers your skin, a wide-brimmed hat, and sunglasses. "Don't underestimate how quickly you can get burned," Krant says. Slather sunscreen on 15 to 30 minutes before heading into the sun, and make sure it's at least SPF 30 and marked with the phrase "broad spectrum," which indicates that it protects against the two types of ultraviolet rays capable of causing sunburn: UVA and UVB.

If it's too late, and that burn has already made its mark, aloe vera isn't your only option. "There's no 'cure' for a sunburnâ€"it simply has to run its course," says Cynthia Bailey, a dermatologist practicing in Sebastopol, Calif. "But you can sooth inflammation to make your skin more comfortable." [Read more: Try These At-Home Sunburn Treatments]

Angela Haupt is a health reporter for U.S. News World Report. You can follow her on Twitter or reach her at ahaupt@usnews.com. 

Follow U.S. News Health on Twitter and find us on Facebook.

Europe Summit Surprises With Bold Moves

Europe Summit Surprises With Bold Moves

By DON MELVIN and TOBY STERLING, Associated Press

BRUSSELS (AP) â€" After 18 disappointing summits since the start of the debt crisis, Europe's leaders appeared Friday to have finally come up with quick fixes and long-term plans that show they are serious about restoring confidence in their currency union.

Global markets breathed a huge sigh of relief. Debt-saddled Italy and Spain appeared victorious and Germany's Angela Merkel faced potential criticism at home for conceding to pressure for an immediate deal.

[Read: Europe's Next Big Steps to Tackle Crisis.]

The leaders of the 17 countries that use the euro agreed to:

â€"Pump money from two European bailout funds directly into troubled European banks later this year, rather than make loans to governments to bail out the banks. The move rescues banks without putting strapped countries deeper in debt.

â€"Use bailout money "in a flexible and efficient manner to stabilize" European government bond markets. That suggests that money will be used to buy government bonds, which should ease the pressure on countries like Italy and Spain.

â€"Let "virtuous" countries tap European rescue funds directly without submitting to stringent bailout programs.

â€"Tie their budgets, currency and governments ever tighter in a vast new economic union down the line.

European Council President Herman Van Rompuy called it a "breakthrough." Financial markets appeared to agree â€" global stocks and the euro rallied hard, and the pressure on Spanish and Italian bonds eased markedly.

Concerns remain though.

Most of the measures approved in the Brussels summit will take months to come into force. The €500 billion ($634 billion) firepower of the EU's future permanent rescue fund, the European Stability Mechanism, or ESM, may not be enough â€" Italy alone has outstanding debt of €2.4 trillion.

And given how shaky the public finances of Spain and Italy are, and how jittery markets have been, the crisis could flare up again.

But some key points will kick in within 10 days: On July 9, eurozone countries will strike a deal governing Spain's banking bailout and allow the temporary bailout fund to directly purchase Spanish government bonds.

In the markets, the summit decisions have been hailed as a victory for Spain and Italy, whose borrowing costs have risen to near unsustainable levels despite their efforts to cut spending and reform their economies.

[Check it Out: Today in Photos From U.S. News World Report.]

In Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel is likely to face a grilling from a skeptical German Parliament later. Heading into the summit, Merkel had stuck to her line that any financial help from Europe's bailout fund must come with tough conditions, so a separate decision allowing countries that have reformed their economies easier access to bailouts, without such stringent conditions, was widely seen as a defeat by the German press.

Merkel insisted the funds would still only be released when it was clear countries were undertaking serious reforms.

"We remain completely within our approach so far: help, trade-off, conditionality and control, and so I think we have done something important, but we have remained true to our philosophy of no help without a trade-off," Merkel told reporters in Brussels.

Van Rompuy dismissed talk that Merkel had lost in the negotiations.

"It was a tough negotiation," Van Rompuy said. "It took hours yesterday. And you can't summarize this in winners and losers."

Leaders of the full 27-member European Union, which includes non-euro countries such as Britain and Poland, also agreed to a long-term framework toward tighter budgetary and political union, though those plans will require treaty changes and won't be realized for years.

Health Tip: Is Your Pregnancy Higher Risk?

Health Tip: Is Your Pregnancy Higher Risk?

(HealthDay News) -- If you're pregnant, a series of physical and demographic factors may dictate that your pregnancy is "high-risk" and requires special care.

[READ: U.S. Teen Pregnancy Rate Continues to Fall.]

The Womenshealth.gov website offers these examples of factors that can make a pregnancy high-risk:

  • Being young or being older than age 35.
  • Being underweight or overweight.
  • Having had complications during a prior pregnancy.
  • Having had at least one chronic health problem before pregnancy, such as diabetes, high blood pressure, cancer, HIV or an autoimmune disorder.
  • Expecting twins or triplets, etc.

Copyright © 2012 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Judge Hears Arguments at Zimmerman Bond Hearing

Judge Hears Arguments at Zimmerman Bond Hearing

Zimmerman, Trayvon

After his bond was revoked, George Zimmerman, right, returns to the John E. Polk Correctional Facility in Sanford, Fla., Sunday, June 3, 2012.

By KYLE HIGHTOWER, Associated Press

SANFORD, Fla. (AP) â€" Prosecutors and a lawyer for the neighborhood watch volunteer who fatally shot Trayvon Martin wrangled Friday over the money George Zimmerman received after he was charged with second-degree murder.

Zimmerman's attorney called an expert on finances to testify Friday at Zimmerman's bond hearing. Attorney Mark O'Mara was trying to show that Zimmerman and his wife did not try to hide anything when they moved money from a PayPal account to their family accounts.

"All the ends and outs match perfectly," said Adam Magill, a financial forensic specialist.

[READ: Explanations Key at Zimmerman's 2nd Bond Meeting.]

But Magill also testified that moving the money around from different accounts would "make it appear that you didn't have the money."

The hearing was still ongoing late Friday morning.

Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester revoked Zimmerman's $150,000 bond earlier this month when prosecutors told the judge Zimmerman and his wife misled the court about how much money they had during the April bond hearing.

Prosecutors said a website Zimmerman created for his legal defense had raised $135,000 at the time of his first bond hearing. Zimmerman and his wife did not mention the money then.

Prosecutors also said the couple talked in code during recorded jailhouse conversations about how to transfer the donations to different bank accounts. At one point, George Zimmerman asked how much money they had. She replied "$155." Prosecutors allege that was code for $155,000. Their reference to "Peter Pan" was code for the PayPal system through which the donations were made, prosecutors said.

Shellie Zimmerman has since been charged with perjury. She is out of jail on $1,000 bond and her arraignment is set for July 31.

Zimmerman's defense also played videos of Zimmerman talking and showing his injuries after the shooting. Attorneys then spent time questioning Kevin O'Rourke, a Sanford firefighter and emergency medical technician who responded to the shooting scene. Attorneys asked questions about the extent of Zimmerman's injuries, particularly how much blood was on his head and face.

"A good 45 percent of his head and face were covered with blood," O'Rourke said.

Legal experts say Zimmerman needs a good explanation to persuade the judge to let him out of jail again while he awaits trial.

"If his explanation is really weak ... I think Lester could keep him in jail," said Randy McClean, an Orlando-area defense attorney who is following the case. "If he really comes across as being genuine and has a reasonable explanation, because I don't see how it could be a great explanation, then I think Lester will probably pump up the conditions, up his monetary conditions and let him back on bond."

Working in Zimmerman's favor, the judge has said, is he turned himself in when charges were filed and kept law enforcement informed of his location when he went into hiding because of threats against him and his family. Weighing against him is the seriousness of the charge as well as other brushes with the law, including an arrest for resisting an undercover officer.

Zimmerman has been charged with second-degree murder for fatally shooting 17-year-old Martin on Feb. 26 at a gated apartment community in Sanford. Zimmerman has pleaded not guilty and claims the shooting was self-defense under the state's "stand your ground" law.

Martin's parents and supporters claim the teenager was targeted because he was black and Zimmerman started the confrontation that led to the shooting. Zimmerman's father is white and his mother is Hispanic.

The 44 days between the shooting and Zimmerman's arrest inspired nationwide protests, led to the departure of the Sanford police chief and prompted a U.S. Department of Justice probe.

Falling Gas Prices: Good News for Consumers, Bad News for the Economy?

Falling Gas Prices: Good News for Consumers, Bad News for the Economy?

Americans saw some of the lowest gasoline prices since January this week.

Americans saw some of the lowest gasoline prices since January this week.

This past week, Americans saw some of the lowest gasoline prices since January, with the national average falling below $3.40 per gallon, more than 50 cents off the April peak of $3.94. According to the Associated Press, the pullback should save consumers roughly $200 million a day.

Looks like that summer road trip is back onâ€"everyone rejoice, right?

Not so fast. While lower gas prices mean Americans will be forking over less of their hard-earned cash at the gas station, they also say something not-so-pleasant about the global economy: It's slowing down.

How do experts know? Gas prices are largely determined by the super-volatile price of oil, which rises and falls according to a vast number of factors including supply, demand, political tumult, speculation, and economic forecasts.

[See a collection of political cartoons on gas prices.]

Earlier this year, turmoil in the Middle East stoked fears that the supply of oil could be sharply crimped, jacking up prices for consumers. This time around it's so-so forecasts about growth for the world's largest economies that are pushing prices down. With lower growth, oil analysts are predicting less demand, which means oil won't fetch as pretty a price.

Lately, crude oil prices have been trading in the $80 per barrel range after hitting a $109 per barrel earlier this year. When oil prices fall, it's usually an indication of weakening demand, which typically signals a slowing economy.

"Oil production is exceeding consumer demand because of sluggish economies," says Gregg Laskoski, senior oil analyst at GasBuddy.com. "That's one of the key reasons crude oil has been trading in a very narrow range below $80 a barrel."

Despite some encouraging news that parts of the U.S. economy might be finding some footing, projections for future growth are being pared back. Europe, too, faces a period of economic and political tumult as the euro zone sorts out how to rebuild the financial systems of some of its most vulnerable members.

[Read: U.S. Gasoline Prices Cheapest Since January.]

After being on a tear over the past several years, emerging markets such as China and India are slowing down a bit as well.

"Particularly since more than 50 percent of oil consumption today is occurring outside the U.S. in the emerging markets and they have been what's pulling overall global growth, any kind of impairment in that demand is reflective of slowing economies," says Mark Luschini, chief investment strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott. "That's a bit worrisome."

All of this amounts to less demand for oil even as supply of crude and refined petroleum products has ramped up in recent months. Going back to the old economics textbook: Lower demand coupled with increasing supply means lower prices.

While that means pressure on household budgets will ease, lower demand for oil and slowing growth predictions for the European, Chinese, and U.S. economies is bad news for financial systems already under a ton of stress.

[Read: Why Oil Prices Could Fall to Below $50 a Barrel.]

"We are all somewhat pleased to see prices going lower at the pump, but I'm not sure it's cause for celeberation," Laskoski says. "It's still an indication of much deeper problems in our economy."

One thing that could boost the economy and oil prices is clarity from policymakers on issues like the federal deficit and tax reform. The stock market and oil prices are manifestations of confidence, according to Luschini, and when they take a turn for the worse, companies pull pack on things like hiring and business investment, which further slows economic growth.

"If things begin to show some signs of improvement, if policymakers in Europe come out with some kind of solution that begins to address the concerns of sovereign [debt] crises, then increased confidence would lift prospects for global demand and put a floor under oil prices," Luschini says.

Meg Handley is a business reporter for U.S. News World Report. You can reach her at mhandley@usnews.com and follow her on Twitter at @mmhandley.

Denmark to Extradite Suspect in Rwanda Genocide

Denmark to Extradite Suspect in Rwanda Genocide

Rwanda

A woman is helped after she reacted during the commemorations for the 13th genocide anniversary in Murambi, south western Rwanda. During one hundred days in 1994 nearly a million people are thought to have been killed, mostly Tutsi people killed by Hutu militia groups.

COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) â€" Denmark has decided to extradite to Rwanda a man suspected of being involved in the country's 1994 genocide.

The Justice Ministry says the man, who was not named under Danish privacy laws, has been living in the Scandinavian country since 2001. The ministry declined to give more details on Friday.

[Check it Out: Today in Photos From U.S. News World Report.]

Danish media had earlier identified the man as Emmanuel Mbarushimana, a Rwandan who was granted asylum in Denmark under the false name of Emmanuel Kunda.

They reported that he was suspected of being one of the ringleaders in the 1994 massacre, when more than 500,000 were killed in the genocide by Hutu extremists against the Tutsi minority and Hutu moderates.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

How The Mighty Mississippi Saved Shores From BP Deepwater Oil Spill

How The Mighty Mississippi Saved Shores From BP Deepwater Oil Spill

In this Aug. 16,2010 file photo, faint streaks of weathered oil are seen on the Gulf of Mexico near the coast of Louisiana. Scientist studying the gulf oil spill differ on the amount of oil that was spilled into the Gulf of Mexico from the BP Deepwater Horizon rig, how much remains in the water and the long term effect on the environment.

In this Aug. 16,2010 file photo, faint streaks of weathered oil are seen on the Gulf of Mexico near the coast of Louisiana. Scientist studying the gulf oil spill differ on the amount of oil that was spilled into the Gulf of Mexico from the BP Deepwater Horizon rig, how much remains in the water and the long term effect on the environment.

Most of us have by now seen the happy, sunny commercials BP has sprinkled across the television landscape in the past few months, welcoming Americans back to the beaches in Florida, Louisiana, and other southern coasts affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the spring of 2010.

The ads sponsored by BP feature state and local officials who are obviously relieved that predictions of oil contamination along the coastlines never reached the levels some had initially predicted. They show lovely beaches, and remind viewers that the BP oil spill could have been much, much worse.

[Poll: America Ready for Hard Calls on Fossil Fuels, Climate]

Now, a study from researchers at the University of Pennsylvania published in PLoS ONE may help explain why much of the crude oil from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill never made it to land: The Mississippi River pushed back--and kept much of the oil offshore.

"We noticed that there was a big disconnect between the forecasts of where the oil was going to be the next day and where the oil actually was the next day," said Douglas Jerolmack, one of three geoscientists who used publicly available data sets to look at whether the force of the Mississippi River emptying into the Gulf of Mexico could have plausibly countered some of the effects of the oil spill.

The first place researchers looked was outside the usual scope of ocean circulation models that generally don't take "secondary" forces like major rivers emptying into the oceans into account when they predict where things (like oil) will travel in the ocean. They found that the Mississippi River had, in fact, protected the coastline.

"That maybe shouldn't be a surprise, because these computer models were not generated to forecast the movement of oil," he said. "They were generated to forecast the movement of water."

As the researchers looked through the data, what they found was a very fortunate combination of natural forces that protected the coastline. While ocean circulation models were predicting oil slick migration in the Gulf of Mexico--and potentially even along the eastern U.S. coastline--they weren't looking at the effects of secondary eddy slopes or Mississippi River hydrodynamics.

Instead, the data showed that, under conditions of relatively high river discharge and weak winds, a freshwater mound could form around the Mississippi River Delta and push back against the incoming water, keeping the oil from reaching the coastline.

Jerolmack, an assistant professor in the University of Pennsylvania's department of earth and environmental sciences, explained that the water surface containing the oil essentially tilted "downhill" due to the natural forces of the river--in effect, pushing the oil back out to sea.

Jerolmack, along with lead author Federico Falcini (who was a postdoctoral investigator in his lab at the time) and a third researcher from Italy, pulled data from the Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research and other satellite data to compare water surface movements. They were able to separate out the effects of the freshwater forces from the Mississippi.

"We recognized that there was a very persistent mound, a bump or a bulge, in the elevation of the sea surface in the vicinity of the Mississippi Delta," he said. "The model was able to predict the speed at which the oil moved away from this freshwater mound and how long it took for the oil to move away from the mound."

[Vatican Cracks Open Doors to 'Secret' Archive]

The researchers also studied what might happen if an oil spill happened during hurricane season, which generally begins around the first of June each year. High winds could counter the natural forces of the freshwater mounds from the Mississippi River emptying into the gulf.

The researchers have developed a new model for the physical mechanism and novel effect of the Mississippi River if, heaven forbid, there's another oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and science is asked to predict where the oil might migrate. Their work will be added to more complex ocean models and improve forecasts of slick migration for future spills.

For long, continuous oil spills like Deepwater--which will remain a possibility as long as oil drilling occurs in the deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico--researchers will need every tool they can find to predict daily oil slick migration. If science can predict where the oil will go, resources can then be deployed to the coastal areas most likely to be affected.

So, perhaps, BP should thank the Mississippi River in its new round of TV ads welcoming us back to the beaches--because the effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill could have been a whole lot worse otherwise.

Is Your Financial Adviser a Clown?

Is Your Financial Adviser a Clown?

David B. Armstrong

David B. Armstrong

There is no shortage of advice on the Internet that attempts to help individuals select a financial adviser, but a lot of it is centered on weeding out the crooks. This is great information, and certainly relevant given the buffoonery uncovered over the recent years.

However, there seems to be a shortage of useful advice on how to select the best adviser once the clowns have been culled from the list. The real key is to separate the pros from the salespeople. Here are some tips from a practitioner:

Consider eliminating the wrong advisers. Professional financial advice seems to come from a dizzying array of sources. For example, are you using a "financial planner," a "financial adviser," a "wealth manager," or a "private wealth manager"? Instead of getting hung up on the title, what’s important is finding an adviser that begins any new client relationship with a process that revolves around financial planning.

Have a rogue on your team. -- 22 Ways to Be a Better Boss

If they don't do this, consider striking them from the list. These folks are typically transaction oriented and do not typically take a holistic view of your entire situation. In my opinion, they are not comprehensive practitioners.

It is impossible to determine what kind of adviser you are considering based on his or her title. Advisers either create a plan for a client and base an appropriate investment strategy on that plan, or they are selling you products. Period. Choose wisely here and the rest becomes easier.

Just a thought.

Consider eliminating the financial plans that are free. You will likely get what you pay for. Any adviser that offers "goal planning" for free, or claims that the analysis is included in the fee to manage your assets, is most likely using the concept of planning as a tool to gather more assets. Be on the lookout for asset gathering tools used by firms offering to "assess your goals." These may simply be masquerades for real financial planning and can potentially serve as a conduit for product sales. Advisers lumping "goal analysis" into asset management fees are typically focused on product sales.

Consider eliminating advisers with frills. In general, the advice and products offered by some large firms are commoditized and distributed by a sales force. Successful advisers at these firms are faced with the necessity of differentiating themselves and their teams from, in some cases, thousands of other advisers affiliated with the same firm.

To do this, many advisers offer special client service facilities or concierge services. If an adviser or team needs to differentiate their financial advisery practice with special concierge services, this may potentially imply they are not focused enough on their planning or asset management skills.

Consider eliminating the advisers who outsource money management. I believe in an old axiom modified for my own use: "People who can't, don't." If an adviser outsources all of the money management to outside firms and does not manage any money himself, he is a middleman for the investment decision maker and is selling the ability to "pick the best managers" available. He may be also potentially relying on what is likely a limited number of investment options dictated by a third party. This is a very difficult task at best.

Instead, look for teams that at least include some Chartered Financial Analyst charterholders (CFAs) and Certified Financial Planner practitioners (CFPs) who invest capital back into research, analysts, and technology. Find an experienced team that manages a sizable amount of money on a discretionary basis (meaning they call all the shots in the portfolio) on behalf of their clients. It's a good way to help separate a devoted professional practitioner from someone potentially just selling his or her ability as a middleman.

Real professionals know that the value in their services resides in the advice they give, which will always result in fair compensation. Conducting in-depth financial planning for a fee, managing assets on a discretionary basis, and investing back into things inside their practice that really matter are key differentiators to assess once you have eliminated the obvious choices from consideration.

David B. Armstrong, CFA, is a managing director and cofounder of Monument Wealth Management, a full-service wealth management firm in Alexandria, Va. Monument Wealth Management is backed by LPL Financial, an independent broker-dealer and Registered Investment Advisor. David has been named one of America's Top 100 Financial Advisors for two straight years by Registered Rep Magazine (2009 and 2010, based on assets under management) and has been interviewed by several national media sources over the past several years. Follow David and Monument Wealth Management on their blog Off The Wall, on Twitter at @MonumentWealth and @DavidBArmstrong, and on their Facebook page. Securities and financial planning offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC.

The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendation for any individual. All performance references are historical and are not a guarantee of future results.

Seniors Win Big in Court's Obamacare Ruling

Seniors Win Big in Court's Obamacare Ruling

Putting aside political views and inevitable legislative challenges still to come, seniors are big winners in the U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 decision supporting Obamacare. The court upheld just about the entire law, including its most controversial featureâ€"the individual mandate that will by 2014 require nearly every American to have health insurance or pay a penalty to the IRS.

[See Find the Best Fund for You.]

In the process of providing health insurance to more people, the mandate will generate more premium dollars to private insurers. These funds, in turn, will be necessary so insurers can afford the law's guarantees: No one can be denied health insurance because of a pre-existing condition and insurers can't gouge such people with unreasonable premiums. The law also limits insurers' ability to impose age-related premium increases for private coverage.

Uninsured older Americans not yet eligible for Medicare will be big beneficiaries. The specifics of their private health insurance options will probably differ, depending on where they live. The law requires the development of state-based insurance exchanges. But the form and insurer participation in those exchanges are unclear, as many states have held back on developing them until legal challenges to the law were resolved.

The court upheld all provisions of the Affordable Care Act except its treatment of states that decide not to implement the act's sizable expansion of Medicaid benefits to their eligible residents. The federal government would pay for all of these added benefits at first and after 2020, would still pay for 90 percent of them. But the states in theory had the option to refuse to participate in the new programs.

The law gave the federal government the authority to cut off a state's total Medicaid funding if it didn't go along with the expansions. The court viewed this as economic coercion ("dragooning" was the colorful language used in the opinion) and disallowed it. Noncompliant states thus will be able to continue providing current Medicaid services and keep their current funding.

[See Before the Sky Falls: How to Prepare for a Greek Default.]

Among the provisions that have already taken effect are two measures that are currently helping Medicare beneficiaries:

Medicare drug prices. This is one of the biggest direct Medicare benefits under health reform. Over several years, the law is set to reduce the amount of money that Medicare drug plans (Part D of Medicare) can charge for drugs when their coverage lapses in what's known as the "doughnut hole." Price reductions that have already taken effect have saved Medicare consumers billions of dollars in drug costs, the government estimates.

Preventive health services. Health reform greatly expanded the menu of free preventive services to Medicare consumers. The Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services (CMS) said more than 14 million Medicare users get at least one free preventive health service during the first five months of 2012.

In addition, the law includes potentially far-reaching changes that would make it easier for seniors to receive medical services in their homes instead of institutional settings like nursing homes.

[See Some 401(k) Plans Let You Take the Wheelâ€"If You Dare.]

Senior rights groups were uniformly upbeat about the ruling. "You will get more and you will pay less for it," said Max Richtman, head of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security Medicare. Seniors already have saved billions in drug prices, he noted. "The average Medicare beneficiary will continue to save about $650 a year," he added. "That's real money, especially to seniors."

It's also real money to taxpayers. Ideological opposition to government-mandated health insurance has received the most attention in efforts to overturn the law. Going forward, affordability issues are likely to emerge as a powerful ongoing concern about implementing the law.

As part of the push for the law's original approval in 2010, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) played a central role in determining that the legislation would not increase the federal deficit and actually would lower the nation's healthcare bill over time.

In the past two years, however, the legislation's price tag has increased. After the court ruled, the CBO said it would once again "score" the law's budget impact but expected the review "to take some time." If the CBO were to find that the law now adds to federal deficits, the fate of some provisions could be caught up in broader discussions about the futures of Medicare, Medicaid, and even Social Security.

Four Times You Shouldn't Care About Your Credit Score

Four Times You Shouldn't Care About Your Credit Score

The whole world of personal finance advice-giving operates on a number of assumptions, and chief among them is that people will find the information interesting and useful. But for someone to find information useful, it needs to speak to their situation. But note, if you will, that an extraordinary amount of personal finance advice assumes you want to build up your credit score.

What if you’re different?

Some people don't want to borrow money. And reading horror stories about people in crushing debt who must painstakingly rebuild their lives certainly reinforces that feeling. FICO scores have only existed for half a century; they're a necessity for people who want to borrow money from massive financial institutions that will never know them personally, but not for people who wish to sidestep that whole process.

Creditworthiness, like credit products themselves, is a means to an end. Sometimes the risk-to-reward ratio is off, or you have no ends to meet. Keep that in mind and consider if you’re in one of the four times of your life when you shouldn’t care about your credit score:

1. When You Might Ruin It Because You're Stupid and Young

There's a good reason the CARD Act of 2009 banned the marketing of credit cards on college campuses with things like free pizza: 18-year-olds are dumb, will sign up for complex financial products in exchange for pizza, and might think that a credit card offers free money. Keeping teenagers away from credit cards is important for the same reason that keeping teenagers away from hard liquor and motorcycles is important; they don't know how to use them properly just yet. These are all things that most adults can use properly, once they learn about responsibility and consequence. But before that happens, this particular combination of youth and spending power can be very dangerous.

You can ruin your credit score for a long time by having access to credit at too young an age. You're supposed to be broke during college anyway. Access to a credit card might give you a false sense of wealth when you'd be better off learning how to properly budget, and generally growing upâ€"and, worse, you'll pay dearly for it later, when you're actually ready for a credit card.

There's no rush to establish credit with a revolving account like a credit card. Your credit score does take into account the length of time you've used credit products, but you don't need a perfect credit score by the time you're 24, do you? Odds are you won't have one if you get a card when you’re too immature for one, anyway.

2. You're Not Buying a House Any Time Soon

You need to be worried about your credit score mainly for large, long-term loans where a few basis points tacked onto the interest rate can mean thousands and thousands of dollars out of your pocket, spread out over its repaymentâ€"or, possibly worse, flat-out denial. But this is the only time when your credit score can really do serious damage to your financial well-being.

For revolving accounts, like a credit card, your rate is probably going to vary between about 10 and 24 percent. It's not pleasant to be near the upper bound of that range, but it also doesn't amount to a tremendous amount of money out of your pocket if you're dealing with small amounts of debt.

Anyway, it doesn't take a tremendous amount of time to build your credit up. Some can go from no credit, or even bad credit, to excellent in credit in just a couple years, so long as they're vigilant. It’s not as if home buying is a quick decision, so you should be able to plan ahead easily.

3. You Don't Like Borrowing Money in the First Place

This seems self-explanatory. Your grandparents got through most of their lives without plastic cards. In fact, they got through most of their lives without a lot of the plastic goods you take for granted. Today, many Americans even adopt a cash-only lifestyle to prevent incurring debt.

A good credit score is only a necessity for those who want to finance large purchases and get nice credit cards. Ironically, financing big purchases and using credit cards are two excellent ways to absolutely demolish your creditworthiness if you do it wrong. Those who do not play this game need not worry about this, unless they suddenly want to lease a car or buy a house.

Well then, see #2.

4. There Are Other Ways to Measure Creditworthiness

Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion are the three major credit bureaus, but there are lots of other companies that use alternative ways to measure creditworthiness of consumers and businesses. eCredable, for instance, is a new company founded in 2009. It tracks consumers' monthly bills like rent, utilities, cellphone, tuition and child care expenses to create a non-debt-oriented credit profile for its users. Payment Reporting Builds Credit (PRBC) does something similar, and Experian's RentBureauâ€"which, as you can see from its name, is part of one of the big threeâ€"tracks rent payments to build credit.

Already some credit bureaus understand the value of looking at non-debt financial obligations as a way of judging financial responsibility. Soon, perhaps, you won't need to get a credit card, against your will, just so you may buy a house at some undetermined point in the future.

Willy Staley is a staff writer and columnist for MyBankTracker.com. His columns cover banking, policy, and culture.

ObamaCare is Constitutional! Now What?

ObamaCare is Constitutional! Now What?

The Supreme Court upheld most of ObamaCare. The reasoning behind the decision was fascinating. In a nutshell, a divided Court concluded that the individual mandate was really a “choice,” and the penalty for not purchasing health insurance was really a “tax.” You can check out more of the details in my analysis of the ObamaCare decision. The Supreme Court’s creativity aside, the big question is what it means for all of us.

First, the Court did invalidate an important part of the statute. ObamaCare expands the scope of Medicaid and offers states some funding to address the increased costs. If a state declined to expand Medicaid, however, the statute not only held back the increased funding, but it also took away current Medicaid funding to the state. In other words, the federal government was going to put a horse’s head in the state’s bed if they refused ObamaCare’s generous offer. The Court sided with the states on this issue.

The expanded Medicaid issue is important to us regular folk for a couple of reasons. The Court’s decision makes it far more likely that some states will decline to expand Medicaid coverage. For those that do expand coverage, it’s likely that state taxes will be on the rise as they try to handle the increasing health costs.

Beyond Medicaid, the ruling means several things for individuals. First, beginning in 2014, individuals must either participate in a health insurance program or pay a penalty. Called the individual mandate, it’s been the subject of much controversy over the past months. While polls show that most are not in favor of the mandate, it’s here to stay.

Beginning in 2014, the cost of not purchasing health insurance for a family of four will be $285 or 1 percent of income, whichever is greater. By 2016, this penalty rises to $2,085 or 2.5 percent of income.

Second, states will be implementing exchanges to help regulate the cost of individual health insurance policies. Exactly how these exchanges will work or how the government can control costs remains to be seen. But beginning in 2014, individuals will be able to buy individual health insurance through these exchanges.

Third, young adults up to age 26 can remain on their parent’s insurance. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, about 2.5 million people have already taken advantage of this provision, which went into effect sooner than most of the law.

Finally, the law’s provisions on preexisting conditions remain intact. Beginning in 2014, the law makes it illegal for a health insurance company to exclude, limit, or set unrealistic rates on coverage based on preexisting conditions. This part of the law is already in effect for children under the age of 19.

The preexisting condition provision of the law is a bit of a Trojan Horse. At first glance it looks like a real gift, as insurance companies will not be able to exclude individuals from coverage because they are sick or have a chronic disease. But on closer inspection, many see a real problem with this provision and the individual mandate.

The penalty for not buying insurance is much lower than the actual cost of insurance. For this reason, many are concerned that individuals will pay the penalty rather than buy insurance. Should they get sick and need coverage, the preexisting condition provision ensures that they’ll qualify for coverage.

In the final analysis, there are some clear winners from the Court’s decision: health insurance providers, Medicaid companies, and hospitals. In trading following the decision, Medicaid and hospital stocks were up sharply, even during a day when stocks overall fell hard. While insurance stocks declined, that’s likely to turn around, as more individuals will be purchasing health insurance under ObamaCare.

DR is the founder of the popular personal finance blog The Dough Roller, and the credit card review site Credit Card Offers IQ.

Kamis, 28 Juni 2012

Try These At-Home Sunburn Treatments

Try These At-Home Sunburn Treatments

Happy child with watermelon

Pop Quiz: Are These 10 Summer Myths True or False?

Live to 100 Series sponsored by Spiriva

It's all fun in the sunâ€"until someone gets burned. Looking and feeling like a lobster? Ouch. We've all been there: Half of American adults under 30 say they've had a sunburn at least once in the previous year, according to government data released in May. And just one blistering burn can double the risk of developing melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer. "It's not worth having such a bad sunburn after day one that you have to stay inside the rest of the weekend and watch everyone else having fun through the window," says dermatologist Jessica Krant, founder of the Art of Dermatology practice in New York.

Prevention, of course, is easier than treatment. The smartest advice: Avoid the sun between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m., the hottest hours of the day. Wear thin clothing that covers your skin, a wide-brimmed hat, and sunglasses. "Don't underestimate how quickly you can get burned," Krant says. Slather sunscreen on 15 to 30 minutes before heading into the sun, and make sure it's at least SPF 30 and marked with the phrase "broad spectrum," which indicates that it protects against the two types of ultraviolet rays capable of causing sunburn: UVA and UVB.

If it's too late, and that burn has already made its mark, aloe vera isn't your only option. "There's no 'cure' for a sunburnâ€"it simply has to run its course," says Cynthia Bailey, a dermatologist practicing in Sebastopol, Calif. "But you can sooth inflammation to make your skin more comfortable." Try these at-home treatments:

Common kitchen ingredients. Yogurt and cooled-down oatmeal contain helpful anti-inflammatory agents. Turns out veggies aren't just good for your nutrition, either. Boil lettuce in water, then strain it and refrigerate it for a few hours before pressing it against your skin. "Anything cold and wet will help," Krant says.

[See: Pop Quiz: Are These 10 Summer Myths True or False?]

Tea. Soak two bags in cool water, and then apply them to sore spots. Tea contains tannic acid, which helps ease pain. (Research also suggests that drinking two cups a day can provide sun protection, so drink some preemptively, as well.)

Honey. Research suggests it helps heal wounds, and applying some to your sunburn encourages the growth of new skin cells. It has lots of antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties.

Milk. But it's got to be cow's milk. "It has anti-inflammatory properties that help soothe a sunburn," Krant says. Pour it into a bowl and add several ice cubes; soak a washcloth in the mixture to create a compress. When it beings to feel warm against your skin, dip it back in the bowl so it cools down, then reapply.

Strawberries. They're plump, tasty, and like tea, they contain lots of tannic acid, which helps take the sting out of a sunburn. Mash up a few ripe ones and smear the pulp over your sunburn. Rinse off after a few minutes.

[See: How to Avoid the Biggest Health Risks]

Ice packs. Head to the freezer and grab an ice pack. Wrap a damp cloth around it and hold it over your sunburn. (Or cover a bag of frozen corn or peas with a towel and press it against the burned area.) "It's very helpful to gently cool inflamed skin," Bailey says. That's because cooling causes your skin's capillariesâ€"tiny blood vesselsâ€"to constrict. "When your skin is red, the capillaries are wide open and flowing with blood circulation, which brings in the building blocks of inflammation," Bailey says. "When they're constricted, inflammation lessens."

Shaving cream. It's packed with menthol and other chemicals that double as natural cooling agents. It evaporates quickly and will remove some of the heat that radiates from sunburn, so slather it on your red spots.

Moisturizer. Apply soothing lotions and topical steroids, such as 1 percent hydrocortisone cream, to scorched areas. They'll help soothe pain and swelling. Even better: Keep a bottle of moisturizer in the refrigerator during the summer months, and rub the cooled lotion on your burn as often as necessary. An added benefit, Krant says, is that "moisturizing a lot after a burn will keep skin looking better while it peels."

Americans React to Historic Healthcare Decision

Americans React to Historic Healthcare Decision

By CARLA K. JOHNSON, Associated Press

CHICAGO (AP) â€" The mother of two disabled teens called Thursday's Supreme Court ruling on the health care law wonderful because it bars insurance companies from setting lifetime limits for medical expenses â€" a big help to her family.

But a retiree on Medicare called it a "sad day" and worries that the law's new rules coming in 2015 will interfere with treatments doctors can provide.

Across the country, some Americans haven't been dramatically affected yet by the law, which will take a few years to reach full force. But many others say they have felt its effects already and have strong opinions about it.

[PICTURES: Protesters on Both Sides Voice Their Opinions on Health Care]

___

Name: Becky Morefield

Home: Mahomet, Ill.

Age: 51

Occupation: Stay-at-home mom of two disabled teenagers

Insurance coverage: Private insurance through husband's employer

As Morefield sees it, the health law allowed her son Tucker to die peacefully at home with private health insurance covering his care.

Tucker, one of three triplets with cerebral palsy, was always the most fragile of the siblings, Morefield said. Five years ago, he maxed out the $1 million lifetime limit in his family's policy when he went into respiratory failure and was hospitalized for 12 weeks.

Hitting the lifetime limit meant the insurance company would no longer pay Tucker's medical bills. The state of Illinois picked up the slack through a program for children with special health care needs. But the program put strict limits on certain medical supplies, leading the family to wash and reuse equipment meant for single use.

Tucker's coverage was reinstated in 2011 because the health care law barred lifetime dollar limits on coverage. He lived another 15 months covered by private insurance. At the end, he had doctor visits at home, oxygen and enough pain medication â€" all care that Morefield said would have been restricted under the state program.

"It was a blessing for us," Morefield said. "People who've not had the ongoing medical things we've had don't understand."

Morefield reacted to the Supreme Court decision on Thursday, her birthday, with joy. She called it a great gift that will grant her and her husband peace of mind.

"It's wonderful," she said.

___

Name: Margo Criscuola

Home: Chicago

Age: 66

Occupation: Education consultant

Insurance coverage: Medicare

Criscuola is worried that a controversial board created by President Barack Obama's health overhaul will ration health care and also dictate treatments to doctors. She has family members with a rare genetic condition that she said requires experimental therapies.

"I was listening to the radio this morning and heard the news. I think it's a very sad day for this country, for our medical industry and for our health in this country," Criscuola said.

"If you have a law that requires doctors' treatments to be approved on the basis of their general effectiveness and doctors are not permitted to experiment with other kinds of approaches, that makes it very difficult for special diseases like these to be treated."

The board, called the Independent Payment Advisory Board, is meant to hold down Medicare costs, beginning in 2015. Republicans are targeting the provision for repeal. Criscuola fears the board's influence will go beyond Medicare and permeate the health care system. The White House has said the board is crucial to holding down costs and is barred by the law from rationing care.

The law also encourages a payment model for hospitals, insurers and doctors called "accountable care organizations," which Criscuola believes also will limit doctors' choices in treating patients.